Wouldn’t it be nice if remakes could completely avoid comparisons to the original and stand on their own for criticism and evaluation? If only their stories could count for originality and their performances could be judged as if they were entirely new characters. Sadly, it’s as impossible as striking testimony from a courtroom and asking the jurors to disregard evidence they’ve just heard. It simply can’t be done, and therefore, shouldn’t be deemed as inappropriate. The Karate Kid remake is a perfect example – it’s thrilling, entertaining, has a solid story and riveting roles. Yet it’s so similar to the original, a film merely 26 years old and so popular that almost everyone witnessing the new version will already be familiar with the classic, that comparison is inevitable. Shouldn’t it matter that a duplicate movie already exists? And the verdict is that this 2010 remake simply didn’t need to be made. It has no chance of improving upon the original, only altering insignificant details.
Jaden’s charismatic, but younger than Macchio. This makes many of the nearly identical activities both roles adopt odder for Dre, a child most likely not as interested in girls and less believable in more mature situations, including coping with Mr. Han’s drunkenness or even resulting to physical violence for defense. His adversities have increased, although unnecessarily, to include a language barrier and immense cultural differences. The climactic tournament has become slightly simpler, dispensing with obscure rules to allow for a more visually pleasing set of duels, the famous “wax on, wax off” has been replaced by a predictable equivalent set of training techniques, rap has ousted 80’s rock, and Jackie Chan is reduced to only a single fight scene. The tension is high and the rousing excitement is still present, but ultimately it’s the same adventure and the same stimulation from 1984.
- The Massie Twins
Click HERE to read the review of The Karate Kid (1984)
i liked that movie better, its more entertaining and better acting.