Not only that, but they
also don't let people speak out, maintaining a totalitarian regime.
They also have ties in the administrations of both George W. Bush
and Bill Clinton. In one case, I believe that the Bush-era food-safety
person was previously tied up with the companies. That's now quite
a common occurrence. It only stresses the point that the food industry
is a dominant force in the present day. In order for this grim film
to move forward, director Robert Kramer enlists two titans of food
activism to present the facts: Eric Schlosser, author of the revealing
book "Fast Food Nation," and Michael Pollan, author of
"An Omnivore's Dilemma: A Natural History in Four Meals."
As the two narrators/main interviewees, they set a dark, worried
tone for the film - perhaps what it needed.
"Food, Inc.," however, should have been differently
structured, since its material calls for something to match its
groundbreaking power. I also think it had two different films
within it: one about farmers and their troubles, and another about
the state of our food. Perhaps they should have been separated.
But altogether, "Food, Inc." is a moderately effective
documentary showing that clean, safe, untouched food is hard to
get these days, and if it means more money, corporations will
keep it that way.
- Nick Duval
It's funny - this movie reminded me a lot of Fast Food Nation. I wonder how well that movie did in the theater and if it's success will influence this film's gross. Obviously one's fiction and the other's a documentary, but they're so perfectly related you almost need to seem them both. Very interesting stuff.