While most people are
familiar with the Zodiac killer and the idea that it is supposedly
an unsolved mystery, few realize just how close the detectives came,
and the fact that overwhelming circumstantial evidence points to
a very likely candidate. But for the film, actually catching the
culprit is not nearly as important as the thrill of the hunt, or
witnessing the effects of the case on the reporters and detectives
who devoted so much time to investigate it. Robert’s family
life slowly deteriorates because of the outrageous dedication he
has to the case, despite his wife’s pleading to preserve their
family and the lengthy segments of inactivity from the killer. Paul
is also negatively affected, although his digression seems less
related to the investigation and more about making poor decisions,
especially concerning alcohol. Dave is the only one who keeps a
sense of proportion when dealing with the Zodiac, although he does
overstep some boundaries in getting Robert information that leads
him closer to the truth – but this makes for quite an absorbing
account for adaptation into film.
Some people were scared by the Zodiac and his threats on school
buses and children, and others scoffed at the ridiculous ciphers
and menacing warnings. But for a city that was presumably well
informed of the various murders, several citizens behave like
stereotypical teenagers in slasher flicks. A woman pulls over
her car on a deserted highway in the middle of the night to allow
a complete stranger to help fix her tire. Then she bums a ride
with him with her newborn child after her car becomes immobile.
Could this have been an actual act by a grown woman, or were a
few creative liberties taken? The Zodiac killer goes so far as
to claim several unrelated murders as his own, which makes it
apparent that what he really seeks is the publicity, which he
amply received, and yet people still remain careless. Perhaps
these actions are a primary source of schlock film research for
fanatical screaming teens-butchered-by-a-killer realism.
The violence in Zodiac is toned down for a typical David Fincher
film, and it helps commendably, because the anticipation of what
might be shown far outweighs the shock of anything displayed onscreen.
The few scenes of violence do wonders for the pacing, which somehow
keeps you on the edge of your seat, despite the fact that the
film runs nearly three hours. Since the film covers a large amount
of time from 1969 to 1983, timeframes are flashed onscreen constantly
to alert the audience of the passing time. Oftentimes the gaps
in time are only a few hours, or a few days. And while it may
get tiresome to try and keep track of the constantly shifting
time, it's another effect that actually aids in better pacing.
The director's cut is only a few minutes longer than the theatrical
version, so having two cuts seems hardly worthwhile – but
both versions are equally entertaining and entirely worth watching.
- Mike Massie
Disc 1:
Commentary by Director David Fincher, and a second commentary
track by Jake Gyllenhaal, Robert Downey Jr., Brad Fischer, James
Vanderbuilt and James Ellroy.
Disc 2:
Zodiac Deciphered: An exhaustive behind-the-scenes documentary
on the making of Zodiac
The Visual Effects of Zodiac
Previsualization: Split-screen comparisons between animatics
and finished film for the three murder sequences.
This is the Zodiac Speaking: A feature-length documentary (produced
and directed by David Prior) covering every aspect of the investigation,
including interviews with the original investigators and surviving
victims.
His Name Was Arthur Leigh Allen: The truth about the prime suspect
in the Zodiac case from people who knew him and the police who
investigated him.
I loved this movie and thought it was great.
One of my favorites.