Babel
 
         
   
Genre: Drama
Running Time: 2 hrs. 22 min.
Release Date: October 27th, 2006
MPAA Rating: R for violence, some graphic nudity, sexual content, language and some drug use.
Director: Alejandro Gonzalez Iñárritu
Actors: Brad Pitt, Cate Blanchett, Gael Garcia Bernal, Elle Fanning, Koji Yakusho
 
         
"To say that it moves at a snail's pace would be an understatement."
   
 
             
 
Theatrical
3/10
 
DVD
N/A
 
Blu-ray
N/A
 
             
 
 
"Babel" was one of the most unpleasant experiences I've had at the movies. I don't mean to say that it was appropriately or effectively unpleasant; what I do mean to say is that I wish I had not seen it. It was a low attempt as a cultural commentary, failing to instill even the slightest amount of understanding, compassion, or tolerance. What exactly was director Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu hoping to achieve here? If it was to inform the audience, to show that miscommunication can lead to a series of ill-timed and heartbreaking events, then he went about it the wrong way. This film only manages to depress us by depicting people in unfortunate circumstances, and not in a way that's fascinating, enlightening, or even entertaining. It's too long, too slow, and far too downbeat to do any good for an audience, especially if a resolution is desired.

What we have here is a fragmented story of distant connections, told in four separate yet mixed segments. They're so distant that one wonders why they had to be connected in the first place; one idea is incredibly different from the other, pretty much to the point of seeming out of place when forced together in the same plot. Apparently, it wasn't bad enough that each segment was unbearably drawn out, with little dialogue passing between the characters. As the story progresses, its one bad situation after another, and by the end, little if anything has been a worthwhile experience. Yes, I understood that we were supposed to be witnessing several slices of life, and yes, I recognize that it was made to be "realistic." But shouldn't such "realism" actually go somewhere? Was there really no other way to make the plight of these characters understandable and worthy of our sympathy?

I think the best way to describe the plot would be to separate the four segments (I can't describe them in any particular order, considering they unevenly weave together). The first segment involves a poor Moroccan family. The father, Abdulah (Mustapha Rachidi), purchases a pre-owned rifle and gives it to his two adolescent sons, Yussef (Boubker Ait El Caid) and Ahmed (Said Tarchani). One day while atop a mountain, practicing shooting at jackals and rocks, they decide to fire at a passing tour bus in the distance (not out of hatred; they just wanted to test the rifle's firing range). They see the bus come to a stop and immediately understand that someone has been hurt. As all frightened children would do, they run off. They immediately hide the rifle and keep silent about the whole thing, even when they hear the news that an American woman was shot (and supposedly killed).

The second segment involves Richard (Brad Pitt) and Susan (Cate Blanchett), an American couple visiting Morocco, supposedly to reconnect after their infant son died of SIDS. It doesn't seem to be working; it was easy to recognize the tension between them, as was the fact that Susan is deeply hurt over Richard's initial inability to deal with the death. Reconciliation is hinted at on their tour bus, when she reaches for his hand. But then things take a turn for the worst when a rogue bullet hits her square in the neck. Thus begins a whirlwind decent into panic and fear; the nearest hospital is over four hours away, and no one will stop to help. The only option is for Susan to be taken to the nearest village and housed in a Good Samaritan's home. While she rests, Richard tries like mad to get hold of the American embassy. He thinks that if anyone can get an ambulance to his injured wife, they can.
 
 
 
Babel Movie
 
Babel Movie
 
 

The third segment involves a Mexican housekeeper named Amelia (Adriana Barraza), who diligently looks after Richard and Susan's surviving children, Debbie (Elle Fanning) and Mike (Nathan Gamble). Amelia had planned on returning home to Mexico for her son's wedding, but Richard tells her that she has to stay with his children a little longer. Unable to find anyone to watch them, she foolishly decides to take them with her. She meets with her nephew, Santiago (Gael Garcia Bernal), and they all cross the border. Initially, everything goes well: the kids have fun (mostly), the wedding was lively and eventful, and everyone came away happy. But driving back into America turns into a nightmare. When the Boarder Patrol demands Santiago to pull over under suspicion of intoxication, he speeds away. He then tells Amelia and the kids to get out of the car. Now there was a bright idea: leaving two innocent children and his aunt alone in the desolate California desert, in the middle of the night, with no food or water. Did he ever intend to find them again? Apparently not: come daybreak, they're left to fend for themselves.

The forth segment was, in my opinion, the worst of all in terms of relevance. It involves a girl named Chieko (Rinko Kikuchi), a deaf and mute Japanese teenager who's still reeling over the suicide of her mother. She's become downright standoffish to her father, Yasujiro (Koji Yakusho), whose emotional distance is giving her reason to rebel. She's so desperate for male attention that she's willing to sacrifice her dignity. She exposes her genitals to a group of teenage boys. She tries to get her dentist to manually stimulate her. She even strips completely naked for a detective. Why, you ask, was the detective there in the first place? He wanted to question her father over an international incident, specifically the shooting of an American woman in Morocco. Yasujiro was recently on a hunting excursion in that country, and he gave his rifle to his guide as a form of payment.

All four of these segments are dismal, practically bordering on melodrama. This is shown through some unnecessary plot details: one of Abdulah's sons is sexually attracted to his sister; Richard gets into fights with other tour bus passengers; an affair between Amelia and an old flame is hinted at (but not followed through); Chieko goes to a dance club only to remember that she can't hear any of the music. Why did any of this need to be included? What do they have to do with the underlying story of the rifle? Everything was so disjointed and off kilter that I felt none of the segments belonged together; they probably would have been much better as separate films (without the rifle subplot, of course). Maybe that's why each moment of dialogue felt half complete, as if I had entered halfway through the conversation.

But that's only the start of this film's problems, not the least of which is its intolerable pacing. To say that it moves at a snail's pace would be an understatement. To say that its speed hurts an already unlikable story would be too kind. I only had ugly feelings watching this movie, a movie founded on an idea that would never support such ugliness. "Babel" was awful, pure and simple. It was as confused and unintelligible as the men who tried to build a tower to Heaven.

- Chris Pandolfi
 
More Recent Reviews:
Woman in Black, The (2012)
Man on a Ledge (2012)
Grey, The (2012)
Red Tails (2012)
Coriolanus (2012)

 

  Recommendations:






 

 

There are no comments yet

Leave a Comment




 

HOME MOVIE REVIEWSNEWS & FEATURES INTERVIEWS FREE MOVIE CLUB
IFCS SEARCH ABOUT

©2012 Gone With the Twins. All movie related images © their respective owners.
This site is for personal use only. Designed by Mike Massie.

free tracking